Rockwell: Top-performing OEMs likelier to use tech such as digital twins, cobots to cut downtime, speed recovery

Report from industrial automation stakeholder found leading OEMs use certain strategies and technologies to build advanced machines and systems that help avoid costly downtime far more than other companies.
Feb. 24, 2026
3 min read

What you'll learn:

  • Top performing OEMs are using strategies and technologies such as digital twins, AMRs, and cobots to keep machinery functioning.
  • Leading OEMs are also embracing shifts in cybersecurity regulations as a core product requirement.
  • They also prioritize profitability and customer outcome metrics alongside traditional production yield and emerging people-centered measures like safety and satisfaction. 

Approximately 40% of top OEMs are using strategies and technologies such as digital twins, AMRs, and cobots to keep machinery working, avoid downtime, and shorten recovery time, according to a new “playbook” on performance measurement from Rockwell Automation. 

Top OEMs are prioritizing rapid machine recovery through technology that allows customers to recover from downtime, according to Rockwell’s OEM Advantage Playbook, which surveyed 500 original equipment manufacturing leaders across 17 countries.  

See also: How proactive smart maintenance is reshaping manufacturing operations 

"The next era of OEM leadership won't be defined by who builds the most advanced machine," said Evan Kaiser, VP of global OEM and emerging industries at Rockwell. "It will be defined by who builds a business that delivers consistent performance despite workforce turnover, supply disruptions and relentless market pressure." 

The study mainly identified strategies and technologies that leading OEMs use to avoid downtime that others have not yet developed. 

See also: Why preventive maintenance has become a strategic priority for manufacturers 

For example, the Rockwell study found that top OEMs can recover from a downtime event in 24 hours or less, while an average OEM downtime event can last 40 hours and cost up to $3.6 million. This 16-hour advantage compounds into millions in preserved revenue and margin, according to the report.  

These organizations design machines to detect issues early and restore performance quickly and embed expertise into workflows to reduce dependence on the experience of any one individual. Additionally, they integrate cybersecurity into product design from the beginning, the Rockwell report shows. 

The next era of OEM leadership won't be defined by who builds the most advanced machine. It will be defined by who builds a business that delivers consistent performance despite workforce turnover, supply disruptions and relentless market pressure.

- Evan Kaiser, VP of global OEM and emerging industries, Rockwell Automation

Top OEMs are using digital twins, AMRs, and cobots to design quality into machines and improve deployment consistency, Rockwell found. These precautions are even more important because 35% of global OEMs also cite employee turnover as the top barrier to meeting strategic goals, rising to 47% in the U.S., according to the report.

See also: Crystal Ball 2026: AI-driven cyberattacks are coming. Here’s how to prepare now 

Leading OEMs are also embracing shifts in cybersecurity regulations—such as the EU Cyber Resilience Act, which shifts security responsibilities to OEMs—as a core product requirement, with 63% expecting cyber risk to persist and 39% navigating evolving compliance requirements. 

As a result, 40% are less likely to cite compliance or technology gaps as barriers. 

High-performing OEMs also prioritize profitability and customer outcome metrics  alongside traditional production yield and emerging people-centered measures like safety and satisfaction. 

See also: Ransomware attacks set new records in 2025, hitting manufacturing the hardest

Additionally, the top performers also align their KPIs more tightly with their customer's KPIs. The KPI tracked across 92% of OEMs was production-focused metrics that indicated emphasis on yield optimization.  

Top OEMs, however, prioritized the cost of goods sold and lead times instead of yield alone.   

About the Author

Sarah Mattalian

Staff Writer

Sarah Mattalian is a Chicago-based journalist writing for Smart Industry and Automation World, two brands of Endeavor Business Media, covering industry trends and manufacturing technology. In 2025, she graduated with a master's degree in journalism from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, specializing in health, environment and science reporting. She does freelance work as well, covering public health and the environment in Chicagoland and in the Midwest. Her work has appeared in Inside Climate News, Inside Washington Publishers, NBC4 in Washington, D.C., The Durango Herald and North Jersey Daily News. She has a translation certificate in Spanish.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates